Does the national democratic party voting record support our
economy and the funding of our schools and communities? One might argue exactly
the opposite if these mining projects are not brought to fruition.
$1 million a year over the next 6 years vs. the facts below: Here
is an interesting type of convoluted logic by Minnesota DFL activist Shelly
Mategko:
So, how did the parties vote?
House Vote 568 - H.R.5544: On Passage
Mainly Republican
For And Democratic Against.
Here is where the
fuzzy math with Rick Nolan comes in:
Economic Impact Of Mining Which Rick Should Have A Good Handle On:
To date, Twin Metals Minnesota has invested more than $150
million in exploration and project development activities, supporting more than
160 direct and consultant/contractor jobs. Capital investment to develop and
build the mine in Minnesota is
anticipated to exceed $2 billion. http://ws-wr.com/twinmetals/newsletter/2012/July/article1.html
Employment
data show the continuing importance of the mining sector.
Minnesota
Mining Employment and Payroll, NAICS Sector 21 2007
Source:
MN DEED CEW
Year
Average Number of Employees Annual Wages
2000
7,204 $350,473,934
2001
5,923 $294,987,664
2002
5,517 $273,016,618
2003
5,139 $279,122,837
2004
5,219 $295,623,992
2005
5,132 $311,659,581
2006
5,147 $335,058,894
2007
5,224 $342,887,555
2008 5,611 n/a
Twin Metals’ David Ulrich said that these mines will bring
in around 5,000 high paying jobs. The average pay for industrial work is
$46,000 he said, while the average pay for above-ground mining is $70,000.
These jobs will have an average pay of $84,000.
Many of the metals that will be mined are not available in the United States. They have to be imported. This project could make the U.S. self-sufficient for many of these strategic metals.
Many of the metals that will be mined are not available in the United States. They have to be imported. This project could make the U.S. self-sufficient for many of these strategic metals.
Do very little math and the conclusion is obvious.
Now, which party
would steal millions from northeastern Minnesota residents, our economic livelihood,
communities and schools if these projects don't get underway? If one
were to follow Shelley’s logic through to a normal conclusion one would be inclined
to say the democratic party. They seem to be more interested in locking up state lands in the boundary waters to satisfy the environmental extremist groups.
I don’t believe one can make this type of argument for our
local DFL legislators in the State Of Minnesota
but one can make this argument at a national level in government. The locals
get the big picture, I wish I could say the same for the rest of the national
DFL.
Now then, Mr.
Nolan. Would you have voted for us or against us on H.R. 5544?
A yes or no answer
will do.
Senators Franken and Klobuchar: I’d really like to see
successful passage of effective bills supporting the land exchange and
streamlining the environmental process. Congressman Cravaack has shown the way, it is up to you to take up the lead now in
the Senate.
According to Shelley: http://www.ironcountryfreepress.com/?p=270
Here is Rick’s statement: I strongly support the school
trust land swap proposal passed on a bipartisan basis by the Minnesota
Legislature, signed into law by Governor Dayton and supported by the entire Iron
Range Legislative
Delegation. I applaud this leadership. It is long overdue and will be good for
increased school funding and for increased growth in the natural resources
economy of our district.
I am disappointed that Rep. Cravaack tried to rush a
bill through Congress to capitalize on this, however, then stood by while his
tea party Republican friends took out provisions that would have provided up to
$1.0 million in annual payments to Cook, Lake
and St. Louis Counties.
These federal payments were originally agreed to when these lands were
permanently taken out of the local tax base many decades ago. Local taxpayers
will suffer and it is directly due to Chip Cravaack’s actions.
Rush a bill through? Hmmm, that's a stretch in the federal government with any type of bill.
Now
if only Rick Nolan had been able to do what Congressman Cravaack has already done he
could have taken credit for it, at least he applauds his leadership. This won’t bode well for Rick though with the
democratic environmental radicals. What would you rather have Rick, 1 million a
year or a multi million dollar economic impact to our district? I have to say his statement for 1 million a
year gets Rick Nolan the Fuzzy Math Award for 2012.
This is about trust and who will do right by we the people
in the 8th district and who will actually do the hard work to get us there.
Rick Nolan has yet to make that case in my mind and he has a big anchor
attached with the Friends Of The Boundary Waters and the other extremists
associated with that party. Good job Congressman Cravaack, keep up the good effort, you are doing us right.
No comments:
Post a Comment